Swedish election results: less a step to the right, more a reality-check

Or a health check.
Sweden voted in national, municipal and county council elections on Sunday September 14.
A lot has since been written about how this tolerant, welcoming and peaceful Scandinavian nation has “turned to the far right” because the Sweden Democrats (SD) party more than doubled its votes, taking 12.9 percent of the national vote and making SD the third largest party in Sweden after the Social Democrats (Labour) and the Moderates (Conservatives) at 31.2 and 23.2 percent respectively.
The Sweden Democrats ran on an unashamedly pro-integration ticket. Some would argue that it was in fact nothing but a virulently anti-immigration ticket.
With Sweden’s generous immigration and asylum policies stretching this country’s finances and infrastructure to breaking point – and immigration and asylum seemingly limited solely to applicants from Muslim countries – immigration may well be what determined the 2014 election results.
Meanwhile the country’s seven mainstream political parties have all vowed to ignore and totally side-line SD. If they continue with this policy as they have done for the past eight years, aided and abetted by Sweden’s rabidly left-wing mainstream media, immigration and integration will undoubtedly also determine the outcome of the next scheduled elections, in 2018.
Most likely to SD’s massive advantage.
Because the fact is that the sole reason the Sweden Democrats did so well in Sunday’s elections is Sweden’s abysmally failed policy on integration of its largely Muslim influx of immigrants. It is all well and good to talk about SD as a party with fascist and Nazi roots, and many armchair pundits in the political and media elite do just that. The uncomfortable truth, however, is that very same description can be applied to Sweden’s Social Democratic (Labour) party and its Moderate (Conservative) party, both of which were once firmly entrenched in virulently racist Nazi ideology. The parties on the left, most notably Vänsterpartiet (the Left Party, formerly known as The Communist Left Party) eagerly embrace fascist methods and ideologies in their determination to prevent the practise of democracy in Sweden. Yes, in 2014.
Continuing to do what all the other Swedish political parties and the country’s mainstream media did over the past eight years – ignoring the parallel issues of failed integration and vastly increasing immigration, pretending instead that the problem lies with an increasing swing towards fascism in Sweden – is precisely the attitude that has given SD its steadily rising support.
And equally so, continuing the failed policy of ignoring SD will continue to drive its electoral successes to new record-breaking levels.
I do not write this as an SD supporter, but as an objective liberal who sees with the utmost clarity that the sole reason SD have done so well is because Sweden’s other political parties have gone out of their way to ensure SD’s success – by ignoring what an increasing proportion of the country’s population regards as a major existential problem: failed integration and increasing radicalisation among the country’s Muslim immigrants. All at a gigantic financial cost to the country’s increasingly financially burdened taxpayers.
Interestingly, fresh statistics reveal that the electoral districts where the most rabidly anti-SD and pro-immigration politicians and journalists live are the districts that have absolutely no immigrant asylum facilities. Politicians and journalists living in unaffected comfort within homogeneous cocoons are the people pushing for increased immigration and asylum accommodation – in areas located far, very far, from their own homes and places of work.
Yet it is these same politicians and journalists, sitting in the segregated tranquillity of their own homogeneous communities, who pull out the “racist” card when local residents in the faraway communities directly affected by a large influx of non-integrated immigrants vote SD.
The truth is that majority Sweden is clearly in favour of immigration on humanitarian grounds, but is increasingly insistent on integration of the people to whom it throws open its borders.
Integration, not assimilation. Assimilation means deleting your ethnic, religious and cultural past and blending in with your new host society, whereas integration means openly embracing your ethnic, religious and cultural past within your new host culture, fitting in while nonetheless continuing to acknowledge and openly support your heritage.
Sweden has thus far abysmally failed to integrate the past couple of decades’ inflow of immigrants, the vast majority of whom come from an increasingly strife-torn Muslim world. Previous waves of immigrants – Danes and Norwegians during WW2, Holocaust survivors in the wake of WW2, Cold War asylum-seekers from Hungary and Poland, job-seekers from Finland, Yugoslavia and Turkey, political refugees from Argentina and Chile – all have integrated well over the decades. Not assimilated and effaced their past, but integrated and successfully interwoven their past with the new present. Failure to do just this is what is causing Sweden’s crisis of failed integration.
And failure to address this issue will only continue to increase SD’s electoral successes.
So remarkably, if Sweden does indeed turn to the right, it will be entirely thanks to a pathologically unquestioning, rabidly left-leaning media who steadfastly refuse to call the mainstream centrist political parties on an issue that patently obviously troubles a large – and expanding – swathe of the Swedish population.
In effect an unintended “coalition” between the media Left and the political Right, with the Left actively feeding the Right. Only the media Left aren’t smart enough to realise what they are doing.
Kind of funny, in a way. If only the situation weren’t so very serious.