Posts Tagged ‘TT’

Totalitarian control of the media in Sweden

Saturday, December 17th, 2005

Stalin’s totalitarian heritage is alive and well – in Sweden.

On Wednesday 14 December 2005 the Jerusalem Post broke the remarkable story that the Speaker of the Swedish Parliament, Björn von Sydow, had announced that all bilateral interparliamentary contacts with the Iranian Parliament had been cut the previous day. This was in the wake of increasingly strident anti-Semitic public statements by Iran’s President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and his ever more frequent calls for the destruction of a fellow UN member state, to wit, Israel.

The Jerusalem Post headline read: “Exclusive: Sweden to cut Iran ties”. Jerusalem is less than five hours flying time from Stockholm, and a mere nanosecond away from the domestic Swedish news wires that should have been clamouring for the story.

Sweden’s censored media
But the story never made it to the papers in Sweden. The reason: Sweden’s only surviving monopoly – we’re talking December 2005 – is TT (Tidningarnas Telegrambyrå), a monolithic ‘news’ organisation ostensibly along the lines of Reuters or AFP, but with one significant difference: it pursues an avowed anti-Israel, anti-American policy line. So what should have been a news item of vital importance about Sweden’s foreign policy in a key international arena was simply quelled by TT. It did not fit in with TT’s agenda of continuous vilification of Israel. Nine million Swedes were held hostage by an organisation with a shadowy agenda that is increasingly emerging as a parallel force in shaping the Swedish psyche and Swedish foreign policy.

Deliberate deception
TT’s Middle East desk is staffed by journalists with a highly prejudiced, preconceived goal, journalists whose end-game shapes the news that is allowed to filter through to the paying Swedish public.

It is rather telling that the only Swedish newspaper to carry the story a day later was “Dagen”, a Christian newspaper that prides itself on upholding the principles of professional journalism – a story is a story on the merits of it being a story, nothing else.

No other Swedish paper was able to carry the story, because Dagen is one of the few Swedish dailies that does not take all its Middle East input from TT but instead has its own freelance reporter in the region.

TT’s media crimes
TT’s media crimes are legion: 19-year-old Palestinians shot dead by the IDF while using guns or bombs are routinely labelled “children”, while Israeli children such as the five Hatuel children who were executed from a distance of a metre with a bullet each to the head while strapped into the child seats of their car – are labelled “settlers”. Palestinians who deliberately target and kill Israeli civilians are labelled “activists” while Israelis living on the West Bank are labelled “right-wing religious extremists”, even if they’re just on their way to school or work. Israel’s attacks against specific terrorists are termed “targeted murder”, while Palestinian homicide bombings that cause wanton death and destruction among Israeli civilians are termed “actions”, “attacks” or simply “explosions”. On 10 September 2002 TT described the typical Palestinian homicide bomber as “a suffering refugee camp resident … who ends the miserable life Israel has forced upon him in a final defiant fireworks display”. Yes, this is a correct translation – TT refers to wanton homicide bombings against civilians as “fireworks”.

On 26 October this year TT referred to Israel as “the Zionist regime”. The West Bank and Gaza are routinely referred to as “Palestine”.

Systematic misrepresentation of facts
TT routinely mistranslates documents – even documents that are official, openly available and easily verifiable. On 15 October this year, for instance, TT listed the USA’s four demands on Syria’s Baath regime, quoting The Times of Britain as its source. But whereas The Times gave all four demands in their entirety, TT deleted the one which required Syria to end support for Palestinian terror groups, and instead simply divided the first demand into two separate points, to maintain the image of four separate demands.

A few days earlier, on 12 October 2005, TT published a telegram where the following text regarding the Palestinian population was printed (direct translation from TT’s original wording):

900,000 of the population are refugees, or descendants of refugees, who were driven out of their homes when the State of Israel was formed in 1948.”

However, the above telegram was in its turn a direct Swedish translation from an English text by AFP, but with certain key elements altered by TT. The original AFP telegram reads:

Around 900,000 of the population are refugees who were expelled or left their homes after the creation of the state of Israel in 1948 and their children.”

No mention of anyone leaving their homes. The bold-type emphasis is mine; it underscores the difference between journalism and the sort of material that TT routinely disseminates to the paying Swedish public.

Little Middle East news gets past the TT censor. The free media – that is, the media outside Sweden – might want to take a close look at TT. Because the way things are, totalitarianism is alive and well in Sweden – the last bastion of monopolistic news censorship in an otherwise free-market economy.

The art of terror, Swedish style

Wednesday, September 22nd, 2004
January this year saw a controversial work of art exhibited in Stockholm. “Snow White” depicted a smiling female Palestinian terrorist sailing in a pool of blood-red water. Israel’s Ambassador to Sweden Zvi Mazel added a touch of unexpected action to the exhibit by disconnecting the lights and throwing a tripod into the pool.

Mr. Mazel’s actions sparked strong protests from both the Swedish cultural elite and the country’s media, whose herd instinct on anything relating to the Middle East is legendary. The media have maintained a largely negative stance on the ambassador’s actions – echoing their attitude to the country he represents – while Swedish public opinion, assaulted by repeated footage of the carnage in Israel caused by Palestinian suicide bombings, tend to side with the beleaguered ambassador.

Media catching up to reality
Now it seems the Swedish media are beginning to catch up with public opinion. On 21 September, Thomas Lunderquist, commenting on cultural issues in Sweden’s foremost daily Svenska Dagbladet, wrote that art “must remain free in a decent society … For that reason, ambassador Zvi Mazel’s action was wrong. But let’s keep a healthy sense of perspective in all this. What is most worthy of our indignation? To set off a bomb in an Israeli-Arab restaurant and kill 21 civilians and injure another 50 or so people, or to disconnect the power socket from a lamp and then chuck the lamp into a pool of water? … (This reaction) was an expression of desperation in the face of Sweden’s inability or unwillingness to understand Israel and its citizens’ struggle for a fundamental human right – survival.”

By remarkable coincidence, Lunderquist’s article came shortly after Reuters’ global managing editor David A. Schlesinger confirmed that he instructs his reporters not to use terms like “terrorism” in reports from the Arab world because “my goal is to protect our reporters”. Reporting the news apparently isn’t a foremost concern at Reuters. One might well ask what else Reuters are denying the public.

Censorship thrives
Many of the international stories that monopoly Swedish news agency TT allows through to its readers come from Reuters. Consequently, the views of Swedish journalists are prejudiced already at source, even before the public get their TT-sanitised version of events. With this aggressive culture brewing within the media, it is scarcely surprising that Swedish daily Dagens Nyheter described Ambassador Mazel’s actions as that of “a vengeful Old-Testament God” – an anti-Semitic statement equally worthy of hard-line Muslim clerics and other implacable Jew-baiters and Israel-haters.

The political Left in Sweden – securely embedded within the media – vilify Israel while glorifying Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the PFLP and other “heroic freedom fighters”. Here, Palestinian Jihadists who kill Israeli civilians are “militants” expressing their sense of desperation.

Financing terror in Sweden
Other Jihadists, however, created a watershed in Swedish perceptions. The Beslan atrocity in early September predictably had some Swedish papers rushing to defend the perpetrators, explaining that the militants were simply venting their desperation. But this time the reasoning did not go down well with the Swedish public, the images of the young victims proving too powerful for the media to overcome. The Beslan outrage was followed by a Swedish Communist Party Youth Wing conference in Gothenburg in support of Hamas and the PFLP – both branded as terror organisations by the EU, of which Sweden is a member. The intended keynote speaker was PFLP terrorist and airline hijacker Leila Khaled. Swedish Greens Party MP Gustav Fridolin – expelled earlier this year from Israel – was also due to address the conference. Public outrage persuaded both to cancel.

Sweden is a society that accommodates terrorists, nurtures terrorism apologists and gives a free rein to news agencies that routinely censor the news. It’s a society that reacts with horror to the slaughter of children in Beslan, but has been conditioned by its media to ignore a proportionately higher death toll when the victims are Jewish kids in Israel. It’s a frightening society where people look the other way while 6 Muslim youngsters throw a Jewish boy off a bus because he “has no right to breathe the same air as real people”, and where passersby ignore a Jewish school student as a gang of 9 Muslim youths advance on him in broad daylight with the ominous words “Don’t you know it’s dangerous to be a Jew in Sweden? We’ll show you just how dangerous it is.”

And yet it would appear that the highly unorthodox words and actions of Ambassador Mazel back in January are actually bearing fruit. Sweden now has an increasing number of journalists who dare do something that is un-Swedish in its very nature: they beg to differ, they highlight the truth. The truth about Muslim anti-Semitism, media blindness to an issue the public encounters every day, and media animosity to the existence of Israel.

Debate as an art form
Nine months after the event, Sweden is debating terror as an art form. Today there is open debate on the Swedish Church’s Boycott-Israel campaign, for which church donations are being used. There is debate about the millions donated by the EU and Swedish aid agency SIDA to various Palestinian causes – including anti-Semitic propaganda and sponsorship of the outlawed PFLP’s conference in Sweden. And the spotlight is finally being trained on the media’s knee-jerk refusal to criticise a corrupt Palestinian leadership that financially straitened Swedish taxpayers are being forced to bankroll through SIDA.

Debate too is an art form, an art form whose words are every bit as powerful as weapons are. Swedish society is gradually adjusting to an art form where public discourse may finally get the recognition it deserves, thanks to some forthright words – and actions – by an Israeli diplomat.